Multi-channel intake
Chat, email, and WhatsApp so requests are recorded wherever staff actually ask.
// industries / healthcare-health-tech
Healthcare IT carries an unusual combination: clinical-adjacent systems where downtime has real consequences, and a compliance posture where every access change needs to be explainable. Both push in the same direction — the queue has to be dependable, and the record has to be complete.
FlowTux focuses on those two properties: intake that does not depend on anyone remembering a portal, and a timeline on every ticket that shows what happened and who or what decided it.
A request filed from chat gets recorded; a request shouted down a corridor does not.
Clinical and operational staff do not file tickets in a portal during a shift, so requests move to whoever is nearby. The work still happens, but it is unmeasured, unevenly distributed, and invisible when someone asks whether the team is under-resourced.
Moving intake into the channels people already use — chat, email, WhatsApp for field and mobile staff — is what converts that shadow work into a record without asking anyone to change how they ask for help.
Automate the routine; route anything touching patient data or clinical systems to a person.
The allow-list model matters more here than almost anywhere. Standard IT work — password resets, equipment, access already covered by policy — is reversible, verifiable, and safe to automate with a logged trail. Anything touching patient data, clinical systems, or access with regulatory implications belongs on a written never-automate register.
FlowTux keeps that boundary explicit rather than implicit, so what is automated is a documented decision your compliance function can review, not an emergent property of a model’s confidence.
Who got access to what, when, and who authorized it — as a query.
Access changes and system interventions are exactly what an assessment or an incident investigation will ask about. When every grant, revocation, and automated action lands on a ticket timeline with the authorizing rule attached, answering is a search rather than an archaeology project.
Chat, email, and WhatsApp so requests are recorded wherever staff actually ask.
append-only
Every classification, action, and status change logged where reviewers can find it.
allow-listed
Routine IT work automatable; sensitive categories on a written never-automate register.
Ticket access follows the permissions of the source channel.
Impact-based severity with escalation paths for systems where downtime matters.
EU, US, or India, selected at signup.
Choose your data region
At signup, before any data lands.
Open intake where staff work
Chat and email first; WhatsApp for mobile and field staff.
Write the never-automate register
Patient data, clinical systems, and regulated access grants.
Verify the audit record
Run one access change end to end and review the timeline with compliance.
For routine IT work — password resets, equipment, policy-covered access — yes, provided actions are allow-listed and every step is logged. Anything touching patient data, clinical systems, or regulated access should sit on an explicit never-automate register and route to a human.
Every ticket carries a timeline of classifications, actions, authorizing rules, and verification results, including anything the AI did. Access changes and interventions are therefore answerable as a search rather than reconstructed from chat history.
14-day free trial. Every team up and running the same day.
No credit card. No sales call. No implementation consultant.