ranked files
Repo-grounded diagnosis
Likely files and modules attached to each technical ticket, ranked by confidence.
// industries / saas-software
A software company’s internal queue is mostly defects wearing different clothes: a stack trace from the error tracker, a failed pipeline, a customer complaint that is really a regression, and an engineer asking whether a known issue is fixed yet. All four are questions about the codebase.
FlowTux treats them that way. Signals from Sentry, CI, Slack, and email land in one queue, collapse semantically when they share a root cause, and arrive with the likely files attached — routed to whoever owns that module.
Most escalations exist to get a diagnosis, not to get work done.
The expensive part of software support is not the queue — it is the interrupts. A support person cannot tell whether a report is a known issue, a regression, or user error, so it escalates. An engineer context-switches, reads the trace, recognizes it in ninety seconds, and goes back to what they were doing, having paid twenty minutes for the round trip.
Code-grounded triage removes most of that class of escalation. When the ticket arrives already matched against resolved history and annotated with the probable files, the escalations that remain are the ones that genuinely need engineering time.
A bad deploy should produce a single owned incident with an occurrence count.
One faulty release emits events across every service that touches it. Without collapse, each becomes its own notification and often its own ticket, and the on-call spends the incident closing duplicates instead of fixing the cause.
Semantic deduplication matches on meaning rather than string equality, so the same fault described differently by two services still lands as one item. Repeat occurrences increment the count on the original ticket.
Escalations link into Jira, Linear, or GitHub; planning does not move.
Nothing here asks engineering to adopt a new tracker. Tickets that need engineering work escalate into a linked issue carrying the diagnosis, and status flows back to the requester-facing ticket without anyone relaying it manually.
ranked files
Likely files and modules attached to each technical ticket, ranked by confidence.
storm → 1
One root cause becomes one owned ticket with an occurrence count.
Machine signals and human reports deduplicate against each other, not just among themselves.
New reports checked against resolved history — known issue or first occurrence, stated on the ticket.
Assignment follows code ownership rather than a static routing table.
$49/mo flat
No per-agent fees, so company-wide filing and resolving is a decision, not a budget line.
Connect your repo
Code grounding is what makes triage diagnostic rather than descriptive.
Add Sentry and CI
Machine signals join the same deduplicated queue.
Point Slack at intake
Bug reports become tickets from the channel they were raised in.
Run suggest mode for a week
Check the attached files on real tickets before trusting routing.
By grounding triage in the linked repository. Tickets arrive with the likely files ranked, a known-issue check against resolved history, and duplicates collapsed — which removes the class of escalation that exists purely to get an engineer to identify what a report is.
No. Engineering keeps Jira, Linear, or GitHub for planning and issue tracking. FlowTux runs intake and triage, and escalates into a linked issue carrying the diagnosis, with status flowing back to the requester-facing ticket.
Events sharing a root cause collapse into one ticket with an occurrence count, matched on meaning rather than exact text, so the same fault phrased differently by two services still produces a single unit of work.
14-day free trial. Every team up and running the same day.
No credit card. No sales call. No implementation consultant.